Dear,
I sent you
the following letter/mail (in fact the second one..). Perhaps your
organisation is participating yearly to the International
Communist Seminar. When your organisation is not in anyway
linked to the ICS, probably I found you on the Internet .....
In the last
letter/mail, or rather in the document attached to it, I gave my
arguments about my statement that many, themselves presenting as
communist organisations, are - to my opinion - "contaminated"
with some forms of opportunism. I gave the Greek KKE as
example.
It is
my own experience, being once member/militant of the Workers
Party of Belgium
(WPB see pvda.be
or ptb.be)
that, when such opportunism is not detected and fought (by internal
study, discussion and by what is called "struggle
between two lines"),
"renegade"-cadres
(cadres or militants who "change class-position") developed
INSIDE the party a conscious REVISIONIST line based on those
not-detected opportunist conceptions so being able to change the
party from a revolutionary party into a reformist party. While the
WPB is for me such a "teacher of the negative example", I
take one cadre (namely Boudewijn
Deckers, who is
also a "respected" ideologue of the ICS)
of the WPB
as an example of someone who "changed
class-position"
and can argue this with Marxist-sounding phraseology... and not
noticed by the majority of the members or other cadres.
This happens
today, but this happened also in the past. And when we don't learn
from the past, we are forced "to repeat" her....
While I
was wondering how much communist parties (of which I studied their
analyses) had “problems”
with a correct (and “opportunism”-free)
applying of Marxism, I came at the end to the analysis which I put in
a pdf-file as an attachment to this letter/mail.
I
hope I can contribute in the ideological and political discussion in
order to come to a CONCRETE and ELABORATED revolutionary strategy, an
unmasking of opportunism and revisionism and to correct
organisational principles.
